Monday, February 28, 2011
Boobs Size Of Nitu Singh
Jihad: "Inquisition" or moral law?
English:
These are pictures of an event at the Venezuelan Asociation for an Alternative Sexual Education. Much of its work has to do with protecting women and children from sexual violence. The services provided by this NGO are in danger because the government funding they have been receiving will be stopped. We can support this organization by making a deposit in the Banesco checking account 0134-0366-00-6331006128. Estas son fotos de un evento en AVESA ayer. Mucho de su trabajo tiene que ver con the protection of women and children against sexual violence. The NGO has financial problems and review El Universal : "The service, which since its inception in 1985, has treated 10,903 people now in countdown. This February 28, the NGO must close the program attention can not afford it. The annual government subsidy, which for three years has been of Bs 260 000, which is issued through the Ministry of Health, was removed without explanation. "
We support this organization through deposits 0134-0366-00-6331006128 Banesco DC.
Sunday, February 27, 2011
Mixed Wrestling Submission Holds
the Venezuelan Association for an Alternative Sexual Education / the Venezuelan Association for Alternative Sexual Education
Source Photo 
In another delivery 
quoted the poem by Nicolas Guillen, "Do you think you know."
quoted the poem by Nicolas Guillen, "Do you think you know." is especially suitable to refer to Gaddafi's mad. In Libya there are still citizens, only subjects that the madman even seen as human.
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Dog Flax Oil Teaspoon
The madman Gaddafi Individual and totalitarianism
Source
Hannah Arendt's portrait
Again I am reading Hannah Arendt, a thinker whose work is more timely than ever. In particular read, "Responsibility and
trial, which has to do with the responsibility of the individuals who gave to or actively participated in the Nazi regime of 30 and 40 years of the twentieth century. look back and say "never again", but not so easy. Fascism now recognize as a particular form of power. But while some embodiments of this doctrine among us again grow globally, we react blindly. As Arendt said about what happened at that time: "We had learn everything from the beginning ...
... "(P. 47). In the 30's the Germans lacked the necessary categories to understand what was happening.
To name a few:
-the right to Habeas Corpus is desapreciendo in the world, is particularly notable in the older democracies
-growing political violence -many wars in the world have no viable reasons justifying *; , governments have less transparency with each passing decade. The reaction of those in power Wikileaks publications attests to this.
Arendt says that ordinary citizens act as mere teeth in the wheels of a heavy machinery. Keep systems running even the most immoral. We, the people, teeth are expendable: our responsibility is "a marginal issue" (p. 51). However, each officer is a human being. And for this reason the Eichmann trial in Israel, years after the Third Reich, you could ask:
"He made you, an individual with a name, date and place of birth, identifiable, and therefore not dispensable, the crimes for which he is accused? And why did it? "
(p. 52)
Arendt says:
" ... if you want to define a bureaucracy ... as a form of government - is a system of offices, as opposed to a system of bureaucracy men ... unfortunately no one is a regime, and for this reason is the least humane and cruel rule "
(p. 52).
Eichmann proclaimed his innocence because he was but a "tooth." But one can ask: "Why did you become one?
Just like Eichmann, all have to decide at some point. And this makes us responsible. Although, as noted by Arendt, born into a world that already exists.
*
Note: Personally I can not think of any war that really was "necessary." Even the Second World War could have been avoided if the victors of the First would have used something like the Marshall Plan. Discontent in Germany had been channeled through non as fascists.
Reference: Hannah Arendt. Responsibility and Judgement. Edited with an introduction by Jerome Kohn (New York: Schocken, 2003).
Source Hannah Arendt's portrait
Again I am reading Hannah Arendt, a thinker whose work is more timely than ever. In particular read, "Responsibility and
trial, which has to do with the responsibility of the individuals who gave to or actively participated in the Nazi regime of 30 and 40 years of the twentieth century. look back and say "never again", but not so easy. Fascism now recognize as a particular form of power. But while some embodiments of this doctrine among us again grow globally, we react blindly. As Arendt said about what happened at that time: "We had learn everything from the beginning ...
... "(P. 47). In the 30's the Germans lacked the necessary categories to understand what was happening.
We on the other hand, we have all the categories we need, but do not know how to react to different growing totalitarianism almost casually around us. Resist as tennis players to return balls to their opponents, but do not think about the game. 
What are the balls that "they" cast?
What are the balls that "they" cast? To name a few:
-the right to Habeas Corpus is desapreciendo in the world, is particularly notable in the older democracies
-growing political violence -many wars in the world have no viable reasons justifying *; , governments have less transparency with each passing decade. The reaction of those in power Wikileaks publications attests to this.
Arendt says that ordinary citizens act as mere teeth in the wheels of a heavy machinery. Keep systems running even the most immoral. We, the people, teeth are expendable: our responsibility is "a marginal issue" (p. 51). However, each officer is a human being. And for this reason the Eichmann trial in Israel, years after the Third Reich, you could ask:
"He made you, an individual with a name, date and place of birth, identifiable, and therefore not dispensable, the crimes for which he is accused? And why did it? "
(p. 52)
Arendt says:
" ... if you want to define a bureaucracy ... as a form of government - is a system of offices, as opposed to a system of bureaucracy men ... unfortunately no one is a regime, and for this reason is the least humane and cruel rule "
(p. 52).
Eichmann proclaimed his innocence because he was but a "tooth." But one can ask: "Why did you become one?
Just like Eichmann, all have to decide at some point. And this makes us responsible. Although, as noted by Arendt, born into a world that already exists.
*
Note: Personally I can not think of any war that really was "necessary." Even the Second World War could have been avoided if the victors of the First would have used something like the Marshall Plan. Discontent in Germany had been channeled through non as fascists.
Reference: Hannah Arendt. Responsibility and Judgement. Edited with an introduction by Jerome Kohn (New York: Schocken, 2003).
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Is Aswini Hair Oil Good
The joke of "equality" goes a long
When Zapatero decided to invent what the Ministry of Equality and place a young girl there recommended by Manuel Chaves professional curriculum which was supposed to have been an intern in an office of a Savings Andalusia, I thought it was a joke.
That reminded me of the Great Ministry of Huxley's work which ensured the happiness and also a joke, I said that it will soon open ZP Ministry of Happiness or the Ministry of Solidarity.
Despite that crap is cost to state coffers and necessarily, despite the woes of ZP had to be close to become a Secretary of State, because I still looked like a joke, face, but joke after all.
However, the consequences of that joke has gone too far. This is one of the headlines Today:
" The man who killed his ex-wife in Malaga avoided jail by attending courses of equal "
I guess one of courses where a teacher very "progressive" pompous voice declaim: "Look, Mr. Offenders must say members and , have parity between friends, not just bar buddies and no whistling at girls in a miniskirt. Very good. Hala, here you have the card of "equal" ... you can go to the street than in jail much macho loose and would be bad company. "
And Rubalcaba said he must have missed something here ... something? Falla all their false system of being weak with the strong and strong with the weak.
Let's see if we are fortunate that the next stalker criminal minded smoke inside a bar to arrest him before he kills his ex-wife.
Postscript : And please, let us speak of "gender violence". "Gender is a grammatical category that can be masculine, feminine or neuter. These cases should be defined in any case, as "violence of sex."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)