not think I have to resurrect that Einstein showed that if you stop pedaling on a bike you just fall: physics, with his bloody law of gravity is thus empirical and bighead.
not think I have to join the last Nobel Prize of mathematics and the best geographer's "National Geographic" for me to endorse the statement that if I reach the summit of Teide and I'm swimming in the beaches of Tenerife have to climb 3,718 meters, that will not get if you just ascend 2,000: the exact sciences are thus more accurate and bighead ... still, if you ask me, that physics.
I also think, to give an example, I do not need to watch all the great documentaries of Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente to justify my belief that food is the basis of life that without it, the individual dies and that to achieve this, carnivores kill other animals need weaker than themselves. Nature is so true that it seems a little cruel when a fluffy white rabbit falls into the jaws of a fox, but it's true ... also somewhat stubborn.
And if physics, mathematics, geography, biology and other sciences are like "Grid" necessarily more "humane" as is business must also be so strict as them if they want to succeed: failure is assured if you stray from the teachings of Mother Nature and Laws Physics.
Well, what I am: The insurance industry is based on something as simple as the probability that an event happens and the likelihood that this has more or less cost to the company Insurer: Pure statistics, let's go. If any insurance company abandoned this method to conduct its business and is carried away by others, necessarily would go bankrupt.
As in the example of rabbit and fox, an entity of this type can not have "compassion" in their daily work. If no premium charged to the poor for "solidarity" with them, or would like to base the amount of subsidies in relation to the economic capacity of each of its policyholders, would not last two days. The cost of claims reserves would end in a pas pis.
Necessarily these companies need to assess their risks by objective criteria, for their sake and for their own insurance. The greater the possibility that an event occurs and the greater the possibility that this fact is costly, the greater should be the amount of the receipt to pay for its client: The statistic is also true of bighead. And mathematics, his stubbornness, they say that the amount to raise their premiums have to be in excess of expenditure claims. I think even a student can understand LOGSE.
But, Mr. leaders of the European Union and more specifically the European Insurance Committee with its director general at the head Michaela Koller, say no, that one clear differences of nature and one of the important factors affecting the risk of insurance can not be taken into account: sex.
Why? Because believe it is discrimination which is not only a difference that, for better or worse, is objective, such as having the rule or pregnancy on the one hand, or having a beard or wear the testicles hanging with the risk of being hit by another.
At this, someone outside the industry may believe that insurance is a macho, always charge more to a person as a woman and that is why the EU protest. Well, no sir. A woman, only to be, a life insurance policy comes out cheaper than a man for the simple fact that statistically their life expectancy is about 8 years longer than a man. Come on, that a woman is less likely to die than a man of his age. Minnows are the mortality tables.
car insurance also comes out cheaper for a woman than a man because "fucking" Statistics show that fewer accidents and that they also are less severe. Despite Bibiana and their stories, men and women remain different in their basic behaviors: risk assessment, statement of masculinity or femininity, etc. that I do drive differently.
But, of course, is that health insurance is more expensive yes you a woman, especially of childbearing age, and this is what he did raise Cain the European Committee: Insurance companies are "sexist" because as women commonly contracted services more frequently (regularly goes to the gynecologist, for example, become pregnant, etc.) have the audacity to charge more premium because they statistically more cost in casualties.
Here is the great sin!
my God! this virus "goodism" increasingly implanted in the world, asshole is going to return them all.
And, despite what he said the joke that Mexican in Mexico we are all "mu" males, I would still prefer to answer as did the English: Well in Spain are half male and half female and do not see what good we had.
0 comments:
Post a Comment