White Thick Discharge Before Period

Portrait Source Hosni Mubarak and Omar Suleiman

comments I heard on CNN about the role of the military in Egypt have led me to think about it.

Gamal Abdel Nasser seized from power in 1954-was not elected by popular vote "no Egyptian leaders have been military or former military in the modern sense of career soldiers, and thus the country's military have enjoyed exceptional opportunities to exercise power, also have always enjoyed the popular esteem. Even now, with the hatred of the protesters in the Plaza de la Liberation focused on the particular personality of Hosni Mubarak, they expect the military lead the country into a civil and secular democracy without Mubarak.

On CNN journalist Fareed Zacaria said that maybe the military is willing to sacrifice Mubarak on condition of not losing its strategic power. He says the crisis are now actively removing the seats held by civilians, and even imprisoned for no reason at present feasible to some civil servants and the military world debugging and using various pretexts.

also say that Omar Suleiman is the candidate of reconciliation backed by the United States but has been head of intelligence a particularly cruel regime. If the candidate of foreign interests, Egyptian demonstrators who crave a true democracy with its demands will be met without any trace of self and fair elections.

And this makes me think about the military situation in the world. What country are we to save your control?

-Europe-and especially the United States go to war every time. The streets are filled with people who protest the most recent act of war (and almost always in the name of an alleged emergency in relation to the violation of human rights), but despite the lack of popular support, always followed fighting somewhere. The public finance all these warmongering which did not choose, through their taxes. Who wants to wear with this unproductive form of bullets, tanks and drone aircraft?
When I speak of the military include industries that support it, perhaps it is the most lucrative of the XX and XXI centuries. Maybe we can identify three aspects of the power of these natural and social forces.

1. The economic power of the war industries
2. The power of coercion and fear of the instruments of destruction and death
3. The emotional power comes from the excitement of war and xenophobia of those who support wars and repression. This item is the most complex since it requires the constant production of new enemies and new heroic models.

How can we resist such a force? I think the first step would be aware of this and also think if you really want to go on or not. We must question the slogans such as socialism or death

country. Clearly we can not just banish such important economic interests and powerful only because we decided to do on behalf of an amorphous collective peace, and again it is advisable vulnerable to destruction that are capable of inflicting. It is the third aspect that can change. You may
turn to what remains of our generation and those that follow to trouble on the real usefulness of guns and those who harbor them. It is necessary to invent a new way of living.